|
Keep in mind, though, that the purported difficulty of algebraic geometry is due to the comprehensiveness of the field. It unites ideas from pure geometry, pure algebra, topology, combinatorics, algebraic topology, differential geometry, real and complex analysis, and (especially recently) higher structures (i.e., all algebraic spaces are collectively classified as belonging in the localic ringed topos of etale sites, and one can construct sheaves with such topoi which encode geometric information about these spaces; e.g. an algebraic stack).
I work in algebraic geometry, and it is for its richness and beauty that I study it. It can seem daunting at times, but one cannot go without a passing knowledge of some algebraic geometry if one wishes to be taken seriously in the modern research environment. I mean, I started off being intrigued by category theory and algebraic topology, and that led me to algebraic geometry, which in turn has led me to understand and be interested in topics ranging from representation theory to hopf algebras to string theory.
So don't sell the discipline short; if you want to learn it, I suggest reading the following texts, then checking out Hartshorne's "Algebraic Geometry;"
+Calculus on Manifolds: exterior forms, tensors, a bit of complex analysis +Introduction to Topology (Gamelin): Develops the necessary topology in a very algebraic way +Algebra: Chapter 0 (Aluffi): Abstract algebra with some categories and homological algebra +Categories for the Working Mathematician (Mac Lane): Categories! +An Invitation to Algebraic Geometry (Smith): Beginning AG--Grassmannians, Schemes, Affine Projective varieties--all at a very non-intimidating pace
...now try Hartshorne. Trust me, you won't regret it; the subject of AG is the vantage point from which the beauty from the rest of mathematics may be observed.
|