9/17/16 Subject Test

Forum for the GRE subject test in mathematics.
Post Reply
LaTex
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 3:53 pm

9/17/16 Subject Test

Post by LaTex » Sat Sep 17, 2016 2:17 pm

This happened today. Any thoughts? I thought it was pretty accessible and on par with the released practice tests. Last October I answered ~40 and got 51%ile. Today I answered 48 and I ran out of time before I could do a few others that weren't too hard.

verysweetjuices
Posts: 108
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 3:47 pm

Re: 9/17/16 Subject Test

Post by verysweetjuices » Sat Sep 17, 2016 2:34 pm

post has been removed
Last edited by verysweetjuices on Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Pentaki
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 4:14 pm

Re: 9/17/16 Subject Test

Post by Pentaki » Sat Sep 17, 2016 2:36 pm

I answered 51. I read them all, and there were a few that I knew how to do if I had a bit more time. Also a couple that spent way to much time on, only to leave them unanswered. Hoping to 70+ percentile, but will take again in October no matter what. Actually enjoyed taking the exam, just upset that I couldn't attempt them all.

verysweetjuices
Posts: 108
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 3:47 pm

Re: 9/17/16 Subject Test

Post by verysweetjuices » Sat Sep 17, 2016 3:06 pm

post is removed
Last edited by verysweetjuices on Mon Sep 26, 2016 6:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.

bhaweshwebmaster
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 7:58 pm

Re: 9/17/16 Subject Test

Post by bhaweshwebmaster » Sat Sep 17, 2016 10:08 pm

Well this was my first time taking the test and I am senior. I think I attempted ~58. Out of the remaining 8 questions, some of them I was not sure about whereas some of them I did not know how to approach.

I think out of ~58 I have attempted, even if I assume that anywhere from 2-5 might be wrong due to hastening as well as due to pure plain silly error or not reading the question properly, I might be looking at a score somewhere between 50-54.

No clue what that comes out as percentile, hopefully anywhere from 75th-80th. I am retaking it in October as I only had like a month of revision of calculus before taking this.

holy_krist
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2016 11:57 am

Re: 9/17/16 Subject Test

Post by holy_krist » Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:06 pm

I felt that the first half of the test was a breeze (I was telling myself, "I'm going to kill this!")...not so much the second half. I'd say I answered 50-55. Definitely taking it again in October. How long does it take scores to be reported? And yes, I hate ETS too; going through this process is probably the most stressful thing I've done in years.. ****Oops, don't want to get in trouble with ETS.
Last edited by holy_krist on Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

verysweetjuices
Posts: 108
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 3:47 pm

Re: 9/17/16 Subject Test

Post by verysweetjuices » Sun Sep 18, 2016 3:33 pm

post is removed
Last edited by verysweetjuices on Mon Sep 26, 2016 6:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.

fluentmundo
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 2:19 pm

Re: 9/17/16 Subject Test

Post by fluentmundo » Sun Sep 18, 2016 3:39 pm

You should not discuss particular problems on the test: if you do, this forum risks being targeted by ETS for violating test security. Regarding the previous post, every test administration uses several different tests (or "forms," as the jargon has it) to prevent cheating.

pat2211
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 1:09 am

Re: 9/17/16 Subject Test

Post by pat2211 » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:38 pm

holy_krist wrote:I felt that the first half of the test was a breeze (I was telling myself, "I'm going to kill this!")...not so much the second half. I'd say I answered 50-55. Definitely taking it again in October. How long does it take scores to be reported? And yes, I hate ETS too; going through this process is probably the most stressful thing I've done in years.. PS, how do you integrate sin(110x)/sin(x)? I blanked on the test and I'm still blanking. There must be some trick.
A simple trick : sin(110x)-sin(108x)=2sin(x)cos(99x) so if F(n) is the integral with resp to sin(nx)/sin(x) then we have F(n)=F(n-2), and it is 0 since sin(0)=0. If you know some basic fact about dirichlet kernel, you can also find the correct answer in less than 1 minute

holy_krist
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2016 11:57 am

Re: 9/17/16 Subject Test

Post by holy_krist » Sun Sep 18, 2016 8:24 pm

pat2211 wrote:
holy_krist wrote:I felt that the first half of the test was a breeze (I was telling myself, "I'm going to kill this!")...not so much the second half. I'd say I answered 50-55. Definitely taking it again in October. How long does it take scores to be reported? And yes, I hate ETS too; going through this process is probably the most stressful thing I've done in years.. PS, how do you integrate sin(110x)/sin(x)? I blanked on the test and I'm still blanking. There must be some trick.
A simple trick : sin(110x)-sin(108x)=2sin(x)cos(99x) so if F(n) is the integral with resp to sin(nx)/sin(x) then we have F(n)=F(n-2), and it is 0 since sin(0)=0. If you know some basic fact about dirichlet kernel, you can also find the correct answer in less than 1 minute
Wow the tricks are real. How can anyone think knowing these little tricks is a good measure of your mathematical potential? Unless I guess you think doing mathematics is nothing but finding the right tricks to use in the right situations, which actually now that I think about it isn't totally absurd. But still...

pat2211
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 1:09 am

Re: 9/17/16 Subject Test

Post by pat2211 » Sun Sep 18, 2016 11:01 pm

holy_krist wrote:
pat2211 wrote:
holy_krist wrote:I felt that the first half of the test was a breeze (I was telling myself, "I'm going to kill this!")...not so much the second half. I'd say I answered 50-55. Definitely taking it again in October. How long does it take scores to be reported? And yes, I hate ETS too; going through this process is probably the most stressful thing I've done in years.. PS, how do you integrate sin(110x)/sin(x)? I blanked on the test and I'm still blanking. There must be some trick.
A simple trick : sin(110x)-sin(108x)=2sin(x)cos(99x) so if F(n) is the integral with resp to sin(nx)/sin(x) then we have F(n)=F(n-2), and it is 0 since sin(0)=0. If you know some basic fact about dirichlet kernel, you can also find the correct answer in less than 1 minute
Wow the tricks are real. How can anyone think knowing these little tricks is a good measure of your mathematical potential? Unless I guess you think doing mathematics is nothing but finding the right tricks to use in the right situations, which actually now that I think about it isn't totally absurd. But still...
I think they are testing your background in real analysis rather than tricks. As I mentioned before, you can solve it straight forward by writing as complex exponential ( as in the Diricchlet kernel ).

SisyphusDilemma
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2016 5:24 am

Re: 9/17/16 Subject Test

Post by SisyphusDilemma » Wed Sep 28, 2016 5:35 am

pat2211 wrote:
holy_krist wrote:I felt that the first half of the test was a breeze (I was telling myself, "I'm going to kill this!")...not so much the second half. I'd say I answered 50-55. Definitely taking it again in October. How long does it take scores to be reported? And yes, I hate ETS too; going through this process is probably the most stressful thing I've done in years.. PS, how do you integrate sin(110x)/sin(x)? I blanked on the test and I'm still blanking. There must be some trick.
A simple trick : sin(110x)-sin(108x)=2sin(x)cos(99x) so if F(n) is the integral with resp to sin(nx)/sin(x) then we have F(n)=F(n-2), and it is 0 since sin(0)=0. If you know some basic fact about dirichlet kernel, you can also find the correct answer in less than 1 minute
Nice trick! I hope I can come up with something like that on the exam, even if I am not familiar with Dirichlet kernel.
BTW: I think it should be "cos(109x)" in your equation.

bhaweshwebmaster
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 7:58 pm

Re: 9/17/16 Subject Test

Post by bhaweshwebmaster » Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:25 pm

Scores are posted :-(



Post Reply