Page 1 of 1

Princeton Review Precaluclus Question

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 11:39 am
by amateur
Q. 14 Page 28:

"Given that p(x) is a real polynomial of degree <= 4 such that one can find five distinct solutions to the equation p(x) = 5, what is the value of p(5)?" Answer Choices A. 0, B. 1, C. 4, D. 5, E. Cannot be determined.

While solving this question, I was puzzled as to when a polynomial of degree 4 or less can have five DISTINCT roots? The question was absurd to me, so no answer made sense.

The answer at the back of the book states the polynomial must be zero.
So for example p(x) = a*x^4 + b*x^3 + c*x^2 + d*x + e - 5, where all a, b, c, d, e - 5 = 0.

Therefore
p(1) - 5 = 0 => x = 1 is a root;
p(2) - 5 = 0 => x = 2 is a root...so on.

Therefore, p(5) - 5 = 0, So p(5) = 5.

Isn't it plain nonsense? I mean does a zero polynomial having 5 distinct roots make sense? How about 25,000 distinct roots, 36437 repeated roots, 23123 complex roots,...

Amateur.

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:34 pm
by Wonderacle
as you have suspected
a non-zero polynomial of degree n can have at most n distinct zeros
therefore, p(x)-5 must be zero because it has degree of 4 and at least 5 distinct zeros

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:42 pm
by CoCoA
Everything is a root of the zero polynomial. This is required when we get to algebraic geometry, and (when the field is algebraically closed) have a 1-1 correspondence between the algebraic sets (set of common zeros to every polynomial in the ideal) of n-space and the radical ideals of polynomials in n variables over the field: the ideal generated by the zero polynomial corresponds to the entire space, which is an algebraic set.

All other definitions are satisfied also, even if they look wierd: every non-zero polynomial divides zero, so for any k in the field, k is a root and x-k divides the polynomial (zero).

Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:05 pm
by rookie
If q(x)=p(x)-5 of degree \le 4 has five distinct zeroes it has means p(x) is a constant polynomial: p(x)=5 so p(5)=5

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 4:29 am
by amateur
First of all, I am really thankful to all participants of this forum. It has been especially very helpful in preparing for the GRE and made my preparation relevant, lively and exciting.

Coming back to the question, I checked on several websites and found that the degree of a zero polynomial is undefined. Some authors define it to be equal to -infinity, Under this situation, I don't think it makes sense to talk of the degree of a zero polynomial to be <= 4, or at best, this statement is controversial. Check:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degree_of_ ... polynomial
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/ZeroPolynomial2.html
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ZeroPolynomial.html

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 4:06 pm
by CoCoA
You are correct that many (most?) sources define the zero polynomial as having no degree. Some do give it a degree, either -1 or -infinity, for the purpose of a complete theory of degrees. Nevertheless, your original question had the answer p(x)=5, which is a non-zero constant polynomial, which does have degree 0. The wording in one answer or another may obscure the point, but the point is that q(x)=p(x)-5=0 is used to determine the zeros, but the solutions of p(x)=5 are the zeros of q(x)=0, and p(x)=5 is used to determine the degree in this question.

Re: Princeton Review Precaluclus Question

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:03 am
by personperson
Hey, thanks for asking this question. I also thought this problem was weird and stuck on it.

From reading various replies across the interwebs, my understanding is that:
  • If p(x) had ended up being equal to 0, then it would have been the zero polynomial and have no degree or a degree of -1 or -infinity, depending on the math system. In all cases, this would make the statement that "p(x) is a real polynomial of degree ≤ 4" incorrect.
  • If p(x) had ended up being equal to a non-zero constant, then it would not have been the zero polynomial and have a degree of 0. This would make the statement that "p(x) is a real polynomial of degree ≤ 4" correct.
Since p(x) did end up being equal to a non-zero constant 5, then it is a constant polynomial of degree 0 and so makes sense in the context of the question. A real, constant polynomial has an infinite number of distinct roots. For example, when x = -n, ..., -1, 0, 1, ..., n, p(x) = 5.

However, the question is still quite strange as it was not covered in the text and other replies stated it usually appears in formal algebraic geometry and theories of degrees topics that are not seen on the GRE subject test.

Re: Princeton Review Precaluclus Question

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:50 am
by DDswife
It says that you CAN find 5 distinct roots, not that there are 5 distinct roots. Mof you go on looking for roots, you can find 6, 7, etc...

BTW, the degree of the 0:polynomial is not 0

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degree_ ... polynomial